
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
The Ascent of the Kona SUV: How Hyundai's Reduced Hybrid Is Vanquishing the Streets - 2
Two Israeli infants among wounded by shrapnel in overnight Iranian missile barrage - 3
Posts falsely claim Malaysian minister to relocate public hospital for temple - 4
Solar storms have influenced our history – an environmental historian explains how they could also threaten our future - 5
How a seabird native to Hawaii has adapted to life in Honolulu's concrete jungle
Overseeing Individual budgets Successfully
5 Great Youngster Care Administrations To Watch in 2024
Emergent Cold LatAm opens state-of-the-art cold storage hub in Guadalajara
Holiday spots Well known With Americans In 2024
BioMarin to acquire Amicus Therapeutics for $4.8 billion in rare disease bet
Nvidia Share Price Could Be Hit Hard By Iran War
Jason Kelce opens about wife Kylie Kelce's past pregnancy loss
Inside The Design-Forward Wellness Hotel Marking A New Chapter In Medellín
A throat bone settles it - Nanotyrannus was not a juvenile T. rex













